Last modified: 2014-09-11
Abstract
new ways of working in the healthcare sector. As the working environment should support
these new ways of working and be prepared for yet more changes, new strategies for facility
planning need to be studied.
Architects have a long tradition of working with end user involvement in the early stages of
building projects, but over the past ten years, a shift in focus or trend has been noticeable.
Over time, the purpose of end user involvement has moved from mere participation to codesigning,
making fuller use of user knowledge and experience.
This paper revisits seven healthcare building projects, now in various stages of realization but
initiated in 2007–2011 using a design-driven co-designing framework, involving end users in
the early stages of developing and designing their future environment.
The co-designing framework and its outcome are revisited and scrutinized here in light of four
factors presumed to influence the quality of the process and its outcome: representativity,
continuity, ownership, and innovation. Each case was mapped through archival studies,
observations, and interviews with involved architects, project managers, and users.
The intention is to deepen our understanding of the planning framework and the consequences
of user participation and co-designing by highlighting recurring factors connected to the
collaborative planning process and its outcome.
The findings indicate that the framework’s basic structure has proven stable and useful in
several projects and, although affected by external factors such as timing, politics, and
finance, still offers good conditions for involving end users in project development and
ownership creation, enabling the development of innovative ideas.
Keywords
References
Blyth. A, and Worthington, J., 2010. Managing the brief for better design. 2nd ed. Routledge.
Coughlan, P. and Coghlan, D., 2002. Action research for operations management.
International journal of Operations & Management, 22(2), pp 220-240.
Flick U., 2009. An introduction to qualitative research, 4th ed. London: Sage Publications.
Gibbons et al., 1994. The new production of knowledge - the dynamics of science and research in
contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications
Granath, J. Lindahl, G. and Rehal, S., 1996. From Empowerment to Enablement. An evolution of new
dimensions in participatory design. Logistik und Arbeit.
http://www.design4change.com/LinkedDocuments/From%20Empowerment%20to%20Enablement.pdf (Accessed 2012-
10-15)
Lindahl, G. and Ryd, N., 2007. Client’s goal and the construction project
management process. Construction Project Management, 25 (3/4), pp. 147-
156.
Mahadkar, S.S. Mills, G.R. and Price, A.D.F., 2010 Stakeholder consultation: a comparative
Analysis. Proceedings of HaCIRIC International Conference, pp 28-41.
OECD, 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. [e-book]
Available through: www.oecd.org/sti/oslomanual (Accessed 2012-10-15)
Olivegren, J., 1974. Brukarplanering : ett litet samhälle föds: hur 12 hushåll i Göteborg planerade sitt
område och sina hus i kvarteret Klostermuren på Hisingen. Göteborg : FFNS-gruppens förlag.
Ryd, N., 2008. Initiating Building Projects., clients’ and architects’ front-end management of projects.
Göteborg: Reproservice Chalmers.
Sanders, E. B.-N. and Stappers, J.P., 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign:
International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 4(1), pp.5-18.