Chalmers Conferences, ARCH12

Programme Re-Configuration: Hospital Buildings, Internal and External Workflow Conditions, and Communicatory Benefits
Daniel Koch, Jesper Steen, Gunnar Öhlén

Last modified: 2014-09-11

Abstract


Healthcare buildings are of great specific and general interest for architectural research as they are decidedly spatial at the same time as they are highly programmed, a type of architecture that has consistently challenged research to find clear relations between design solutions and performance or use. This paper argues that one of the main problems of finding consistent relations between workflow, organization, and spatial configurations valuable for the design of healthcare environments lies in that programmes and activities studied have been described from an organizational point of view rather than a spatial, and have been studied as efficiency machines. This paper attempts to begin a shift towards a more complex, if still ordered, approach. The line of argument is meant to be supportive in the programmatic and early planning stages, focused on how space and working conditions facilitate workflow for and communication between different personnel groups. It is proposed that of vital importance for such an understanding is the dual relations of primary (‘functional’) and secondary (‘informational’, ‘communicative’) benefits of programme configuration and distribution, as well as internal and external conditions of workflow – where the latter can be seen as a difference between conditions inherent in activities themselves and conditions produced by technical, organizational, practical, or other means that affect them. These benefits and conditions are rather studied as tensions where on one hand priorities need to be made between benefits, and on the other hand material conditions of architectural design force choices to be made on distribution and configuration of programme. This discussion is supported by empirical data gathered through interviews and observations from a research project of Karolinska University Hospital in Huddinge, south of Stockholm, where several hospital units have been studied to allow a continuously refined understanding of workflow and its spatial conditions in consecutive iterations.

Keywords


architecture; hospital architecture; workflow; spatial practice; spatial configuration; architectural programme

References


Allen, T., 1977. Managing the flow of technology. MIT press Cambridge, MA.

Amin, A. and Cohendet, P., 2004. Architectures of knowledge: firms, capabilities, and communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Anderson, S., 1984. Architectural Design as a System of Research Programs. In: K. M. Hays, ed. 2000. Architecture Theory since 1968. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, pp. , 492-505.

Baraldi, E., Fors. H. and Houltz, A., ed. 2006. Taking Place: The Spatial Contexts of Science, Technology and Business. Sagamore Beach: Watson Publishing International.

Bergström, A., Marcus, L., & Koch, D., 2010. KI Arkitektur och Kunskapsmiljö: Tävlingen/Etableringen/Förnyelsen. Stockholm: Akademiska Hus.

Blombergsson, M. and Wiklander, J., 2006. Spatial Support for Key Usability Factors: Spatial Influence on Interaction Patterns for 800 Office Workers. In: T. Haugen, A. Moum, and J. Bröchner, 2006. Proceedings for Trondheim International Symposium CIB W70,12-14 June 2006: Changing User Demands on Buildings, Trondheim, pp. 542-550.

Cai, H and Zimring, C., 2011. Nursing Culture and Performance: The impact of nurse station typology on nurses' informal communication and learning. World Health Design, vol.4, nr 3, pp. 60-67.

Cai, H and Zimring, C., 2012. Out of Sight, Out of Reach: Correlating spatial metrics of nurse station typology with nurses’ communication and co‐awareness in an intensive care unit. In: M. Greene, J. Reyes, and A. Castro, ed. 2012. Proceedings: Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium, Santiago de Chile: PUC, pp. 8145:1-8145:20.Châtelet, G., 2000. Figuring Space: Philosophy, mathematics, and physics, trans. R. Shore and M. Zagha. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Choi, Y. K., 1999. The morphology of exploration and encounter in museum layouts. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26 (2), pp. 251-264.

Foucault, M., 1985. Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias. In: N. Leach, ed. 1997. Rethinking Architecture: a reader in cultural theory. London: Routledge, pp. 350-356.

Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Grajewski, T., 1993. The SAS head office:spatial configuration and interaction patterns. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 2, pp. 63‐74.

Hanson, J., 1998. Decoding Homes and Houses. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Heo, Y., Choudhary, R., Bafna, S., Hendrich, A., and Chow, M.P., 2009. A Modeling Approach for Estimating the Impact of Spatial Configuration on Nurses’ Movement. In: D.
Koch, L. Marcus, & J. Steen, ed. 2009. Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium. Stockholm: KTH, pp. 041:1-041:11.

Hillier, B., 1996. Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Hillier, B., 2003. The architectures of seeing and going: Or, are cities shaped by bodies or minds? And is there a syntax of spatial cognition? In: J. Hanson, ed. 2003. Proceedings to the 4th International Space Syntax Symposium. London: Space Syntax Laboratory, pp. 6.1-6.6.34.

Hillier, B., and Iida, S., 2005. Network Psychological Effects in Urban Movement. In: A. G. Cohn, and D. M. Mark, ed. 2005. Spatial Information Theory: International Conference, COSIT 2005, Ellicotville, NY, USA, September 14-18, 2005. Proceedings. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 475-490.

Hillier, B., and Hanson, J., 1984. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

House, J., and Wells, J. 1978. Occupational stress, social support and health.

Koch, D., 2005. Parallel Spatial Scales: discerning cognitive levels of space. In: A. van Nes, ed. 2005. Proceedings to the 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, Volume II. Delft: Techne Press, pp. 373-386.

Koch, D., 2009. Architectural Fashion Magazines. In: D. Koch, L. Marcus, & J. Steen, ed. 2009, Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium. Stockholm: KTH, pp. 57:1-57:14.

Koch, D. and Steen, J., 2012a. Analysis of Strongly Programmed Workplace Environments: Architectural configuration and time-space properties of hospital work. In: M. Greene, J. Reyes, and A. Castro, ed. 2012. Proceedings: Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium, Santiago de Chile: PUC, pp. 8146:1-8146:16.

Koch, D. and Steen, J., 2012b. Decomposing Programmes: Re-coding hospital work with spatially syntactic information. In: M. Greene, J. Reyes, and A. Castro, ed. 2012. Proceedings: Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium, Santiago de Chile: PUC, pp. 8145:1-8145:20.

Lu, Y., Peponis, J., and Zimring, C., 2009. Targeted Visibility Analysis in Buildings: Correlating Targeted Visibility Analysis with Distribution of People and Their Interactions within an Intensive Care Unit. In: D. Koch, L. Marcus, and J. Steen, ed. 2009. Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium. Stockholm: KTH, pp. 68:1-68:10.

Latour, B. and Woolgar, S., 1979. Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Lefebvre, H., 1991 [1974]. The Production of Space, trans. D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Lundeqvist, J., 1998. Introduktion till designteori. Stockholm: KTH.

Markhede, H., 2010. Spatial Positioning: Method development for spatial analysis of interaction in buildings. Stockholm: KTH.

Markhede, H., and Koch, D., 2007. Positioning Analysis: Social structures in configurative modelling. In: A.S. Kubat, Ö. Ertekin, Y. I. Güney, and E. Eyüboğlou, ed. 2007. Proceedings to the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium Volume I. Istanbul: ITU Faculty of Architecture, pp. 069.1-069.14.

Mattsson, H., 2006. How Does Knowledge Production Take Place?: On Locating and Mapping Science and Similar Unruly Activities. In: E. Baraldi, H. Fors, & A. Houltz, ed. 2006. Taking Place: The Spatial Contexts of Science, Technology and Business. Sagamore Beach: Watson Publishing International, pp. 351-372.

Nelson, H. G., and Stolterman, E., 2012. The Design Way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. 2nd Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Penn, A., Desyllas, J., and Vaughan, L. (1999). The space of innovation: interaction and com-munication in the work environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26 (2), pp. 193–218.

Peponis, J., Bafna, S., Bajaj, R., Bromberg, J., Congdon, C., Rashid, M., Warmels, S., Yan, Z., and Zimring, C., 2007. Designing space to support knowledge work. Environment and Behavior, 39 (6), pp. 815–840.

Peponis, J., Conroy Dalton, R., Wineman, J., and Dalton, N. S. (2004). Measuring the effects of layout upon visitors' spatial behaviors in open-plan exhibition settings. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31 (3), pp. 453-473.

Persson, A., and Sjöqvist, F., 2010. Huddinge Sjukhus: 1972-2002. Stockholm: Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset.

Rashid, M., Zimring, C., Wineman, J., Flaningam, T., Nubani, L., and Hammash, R., 2005. The Effects of Spatial Behaviors and Layout Attributes on Individuals' Perception of Psychosocial Constructs in Offices. In: A. van Nes, ed. 2005. Proceedings to the 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, Volume II. Delft: Techne Press, pp. 71-87.

Rohloff, I. K., Psarra, S., and Wineman, J. (2009). Experiencing Museum Gallery Layouts through Local and Global Visibility Properties in Morphology: An inquiry into the YCBA, the MoMA and the HMA. In: D. Koch, L. Marcus, and J. Steen, ed. 2009. Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium. Stockholm: KTH, pp. 94:1-94:14.

Sailer, K., 2007. Movement in Workplace Environments. In: A.S. Kubat, Ö. Ertekin, Y. I. Güney, and E. Eyüboğlou, ed. 2007. Proceedings to the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium Volume I. Istanbul: ITU Faculty of Architecture, pp. 068.1-068.14.

Sailer, K., and McCulloh, I., 2011. Social networks and spatial configuration – How office layouts drive social interaction. Social Networks, 673. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.005.

Sailer, K., and Penn, A., 2009. Spatiality and Transpatiality in Workplace Environments. In D. Koch, L. Marcus, & J. Steen, ed. 2009. Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium. Stockholm: KTH, pp. 95:1-95:11.

Sailer, K., and Penn, A., 2010. Towards an Architectural Theory of Space and Organisations: Cognitive, Affective and Conative Relations in Workplaces. In: 2nd Workshop on Architecture and Social Architecture, EIASM, Brussels, May 2010 (12 Pages).

Steen, J., 2009. Spatial and Social Configurations in Offices. In: D. Koch, L. Marcus, and J. Steen, ed. 2009. Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium. Stockholm: KTH, pp. 107:1-107:9.

Steen, J., and Markhede, H., 2010. Spatial and Social Configurations in Offices. Journal of Space Syntax 1(1), pp. 121-132.

Tzortzi, K., 2007. Museum Building Design and Exhibition Layout: patterns of interaction. In: A.S. Kubat, Ö. Ertekin, Y. I. Güney, and E. Eyüboğlou (eds.), Proceedings to the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium Volume I. Istanbul: ITU Faculty of Architecture, pp. 072.1-072.16.

Ulrich, R., 2012. Evidensbas för vårdens arkitektur 1.0: Forskning som stöd för utformning av den fysiska vårdmiljön. Göteborg: Chalmers.


Full Text: PDF