Last modified: 2015-08-18
Abstract
Keywords
References
1. Ranciere, J. 2011. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Continuum. P.
2. Said, E. 1996. Representations of the Intellectual. New York: Vinatge Books. P.
3. Ranciere, J. 2011. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Continuum. P.149
4. Hughes, R. 2014. Exposition. In: Schwab, M. & Borgdorff, H., ed. 2014. The Exposition of Artistic Research: Publishing Art in Academia. Leiden: Leiden University Press. P.
5. Steyerl, H. 2010. Aesthetics of Resistance? Artistic Research as Descipline and Conflict. eipcp. http://eipcp.net/transversal/0311/steyerl/en. 2015-01-20
6. Said, E. 1996. Representations of the Intellectual. New York: Vinatge Books. P. 76
7. Frichot, H. 20101. I would prefer not to: How Bartleby’s Formula Troubles Collective Design Practices, Alternative Practice in Design: The Collective, Conference, Geoplaced Knowledges, Design Research Institute, RMIT University, Melbourne Australia.
8. Said, E. 1996. Representations of the Intellectual. New York: Vinatge Books. P. 77
9. IbId. P. 80
10. Ranciere, J. 2011. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Continuum. P. 149
11. IbId. P. 141
12. Stoner, J. 2012. Toward A Minor Architecture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. P.01
13. Genet, J. 1964. The Thief’s Journal. New York: Grone Press. P.22
14. Leach, N. 1999. Architecture and Revolution: Contemporary perspectives on Central and Eastern Europe. London: Routledge. p. 118
15. This is a real series of emails exchanged with Editors of El Croquis journal.
16. Ranciere in defining what art does in his Dissensus states: ‘Doing art means displacing art’s borders, just as doing politics means displacing the borders of what is acknowledged as the political.
17. Ranciere, J. 2011. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Continuum P. 149
18. Umeå School of Architecture: http://www.arch.umu.se/en/about-us/mission/, 2015-04-01
19. Azar, M. 2014. Schizo-notes on artistic research as universe and conflict. Transart Institute. http://www.transart.org/expositions/2014/07/01/notes-on-artistic-research-as-universe-andconflict-mitra-azar/. 2015-02-20
20. Sheikh, S. 2006. Notes on Institutional Critique. eipcp. http://eipcp.net/transversal/0106/sheikh/en. 2015-03-14
21. Verwoert, J. 2011. Tell Me What You Want, What You Really, Really Want. Berlin: Sternberg Press. p.59
22. de Graeve, P. 2013 Art School Performances (Could the Artist Please Be Present?). In: Lind, T. ed., Artistic Research Then and Now: 2004-13. Yearbook of AR&D 2013 Swedish Research Council. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet , p.153
23. Ranciere, J. 2011. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Continuum. P. 141
24. Weizman, I., ed. 2014. Architecture and The Paradox of Dissidence. London: Routledge. P.
25. Mouffe. Ch. 2015. Artistic Strategies in Politics and Political Strategies in Art. In: Malzacher, F. Truth Is Concrete: A Handbook for Artistic Strategies in Real Politics. Berlin: SternbergPress. P.
26. Said, E. 1996. Representations of the Intellectual. New York: Vinatge Books. P. 82-83