Chalmers Conferences, LCM 2013

ENHANCING THE LIFE-CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF AN ENERGY SYSTEM FOR THE COPRODUCTION OF SYNTHETIC BIOFUELS AND ELECTRICITY
Diego Iribarren, Ana Susmozas, Javier Dufour

Last modified: 2014-09-11

Abstract


Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis coupled with combined-cycle strategies
could be a sustainable pathway for biofuel and power generation. The
present work deals with the life cycle assessment of four alternative FTbased
systems to identify the best option in terms of global warming and
cumulative energy demand. All systems involve poplar biomass
gasification, biosyngas conditioning, Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, refining,
and power generation. Different configurations are defined by taking into
account further electricity production using clean syngas or further
processing of the FT tail gas via autothermal reforming (ATR) or membrane
separation. Key inventory data are provided through process simulation.
The ATR system potentially arises as the most favorable option. The
products from this system show significant benefits when compared to
equivalent conventional products.

Keywords


biomass gasification; Fischer-Tropsch; life cycle assessment; power generation; process simulation

References


Dones, R., Bauer, C., Bolliger, R., Burger, B., Faist Emmenegger, M., Frischknecht, R., Heck, T., Jungbluth, N., Röder, A., & Tuchschmid, M. (2007). Life cycle inventories of energy systems: Results for current systems in Switzerland and other UCTE countries, ecoinvent report No. 5. Dübendorf, Switzerland: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories.

Gasol, C.M., Gabarrell, X., Anton, A., Rigola, M., Carrasco, J., Ciria, P., & Rieradevall, J. (2009). LCA of poplar bioenergy system compared with Brassica carinata energy crop and natural gas in regional scenario. Biomass & Bioenergy, 33, 119–129.

Iribarren, D., Susmozas, A., & Dufour, J. (2013). Life-cycle assessment of Fischer-Tropsch products from biosyngas. Renewable Energy, 59, 229–236.

Liu, G., Larson, E.D., Williams, R.H., Kreutz, T.G., & Guo, X. (2011). Making Fischer-Tropsch fuels and electricity from coal and biomass: Performance and cost analysis. Energy & Fuels, 25, 415–437.

Spath, P., Aden, A., Eggeman, T., Ringer, M., Wallace, B., & Jechura, J. (2005). Biomass to hydrogen production detailed design and economics utilizing the Battelle Columbus Laboratory indirectly-heated gasifier. Golden, USA: NREL.

Susmozas, A., Iribarren, D., & Dufour, J. (2013). Life-cycle performance of indirect biomass gasification as a green alternative to steam methane reforming for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, in press.

Swanson, R.M., Satrio, J.A., Brown, R.C., Platon, A., & Hsu D.D. (2010). Techno-economic analysis of biofuels production based on gasification. Golden, USA: NREL.

Zahedi Nezhad, M., Rowshanzamir, S., & Eikani, M.H. (2009). Autothermal reforming of methane to synthesis gas: Modeling and simulation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, 1292–1300.


Full Text: PDF