Chalmers Conferences, LCM 2013

KEY METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF SURFACE FREIGHT TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES IN A LCA ANALYSIS
Jorge Leon, Antonio Dobon, Mercedes Hortal

Last modified: 2014-09-11

Abstract


This paper reviews the most common methodological issues found in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies associated with freight transport activities. Main conclusion drawn is that LCA is a suitable tool to assess the environmental impacts of freight transport activities, since other pollutants rather than CO2 and other GHGs are produced, although carbon footprint can be applied in certain situations. A deep study on the pollutants produced in these activities revealed that a comprehensive analysis should be accompanied by a full set of impact categories. Infrastructure processes and land use should be included although it makes difficult the analysis. Furthermore empty backhaul trips and pre and post-positioning trips should be considered and attributed to the product transported in the fronthaul trips.

Keywords


Life cycle assessment; freight transport; infrastructure processes; land use; impact categories; carbon footprint

References


British Standards Institution (2011) PAS 2050, 2011. Specification for the assessment of life cycle greenhouse emissions of goods and services. BSI. ISBN: 978- 05-8071-382- 8

Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) (2010) Freight Transportation: Global Hightlights. U.S. Department of Transportation. http://www.bts.gov/publications/freight_transportation/pdf/entire.pdf. Accessed 29 November 2011

Chester, MV, Horvarth, A (2010) Life-cycle assessment of high-speed rail: the case of California. Environ.Res.Lett. 5: 1-8

Cooper, JS, Woods, L, Lee, SJ (2008) Distance and backhaul in commodity transport modelling. Int.J. LCA 13: 389-400

Den Boer, E. Otten, M, van Essen, H (2011) Comparison of various transport modes on a EU scale with the STREAM database. STREAM International Freight 2011

EcoTransit World (2011) Ecological Transport Information Tool for Worldwide Transports. Environmental Methodology and Data. Update. IFEU Heidelberg

Eriksson, E, Blinge, M, Lövgren, G (1996) Life cycle assessment of the road transport sector. Sci. Total Environ. 189-190: 69-76

European Committee for Standardization prEN16258 (2011) Methodology for calculation and declaration on energy consumptions and GHG emissions in transport services (good and passengers transport): CEN

European Environment Agency (EEA) (2003) Freight transport demand by mode and group of goods. Indicator Fact Sheet. TERM 2003 13a AC+CC. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/freight-transport-demand-by-mode/term2003_13a_accc_freight_transport_demand_by_mode_and_group_of_goodsfinal.pdf. Accessed 15 December 2011

Frischknecht, R, Althaus, HJ, Bauer, C, Doka, G, Heck, T, Jungbluth, N, Kellenberger, D, Nemeeek, T (2007) The Environmental Relevance of Capital Goods in Life Cycle Assessments of Products and Services. Int.J.LCA. doi: 10.1065/lca2007.02.308

ILCD (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System. General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment-Detailed guidance. JRC European Commission

Johnsen, T (2000) Environmental Comparison of Transport Chains for paper. A case study. Technical Report No. 2000-3295. Revision No.1 Det Norske Veritas

Johnsen, T, Fet, AM (1998) Life Cycle Evaluation of Ship Transportation. Screening Life Cycle Assessment of M/V Color Festival. Research report HiÅ 10/B101/R-98/009/00

Rodrigue, JP, Comtois, C, Slack, B (2009) The Geography of Transport Systems. Routledege, New York

Stripple, H, Uppenberg, S (2010) Life Cycle Assessment of railways and rail transports- Application in environmental product declarations (EPDs) for the Bothnia Line. Swedish Environmental Research Institute


Full Text: PDF