Chalmers Conferences, LCM 2013

A NEW SET OF VALUATION FACTORS FOR LCA AND LCC BASED ON DAMAGE COSTS – ECOVALUE 2012
Göran Finnveden, Cecilia Håkansson, Maria Noring

Last modified: 2014-09-11

Abstract


Weighting is often used in environmental systems analysis tools. One
method is Ecovalue which in its first version was published in 2011. In this
paper an updated version is presented. New factors are for exotoxicological
impacts and for particulates. The factor for climate change has been
updated. The updated set of valuation weighting factors also includes
default values in addition to low and high values. The new set is matched
with the Recipe methodology except for abiotic resources where
Cumulatative Exergy Demand is used. Results from an ICT product show
that in this case climate change, toxic impacts and resources use are
highlighted as important impact categories.

Keywords


Weighting; Valuation; Impact assessment; LCA; LCC

References


Achachlouei, M.A., Moberg, Å and Hochschorner, E. (2013): Life cycle assessment of a magazine—part 1: tablet edition in emerging and mature states. Submitted

Ackerman, F., & Stanton, E. a. (2012). Climate Risks and Carbon Prices: Revising the Social Cost of Carbon. Economics, 6, 0–26. doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-10

Ahlroth, S., & Finnveden, G. (2011). Ecovalue08–A new valuation set for environmental systems analysis tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(17-18), 1994–2003. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.005

Ahlroth, S., Nilsson, M., Finnveden, G., Hjelm, O. and Hochschorner, E. (2011): Weighting and valuation in
environmental systems analysis tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 145-156.

Anthoff, D., Tol, R. S. J., & Yohe, G. W. (2009). Risk aversion, time preference, and the social cost of carbon. Environmental Research Letters, 4(2), 024002. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024002

Bösch, M., Hellweg, S., Huijbregts, M. and Frischknecht, R. (2006): Applying cumulative exergy demand (CExD) indicators to the ecoinvent database. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12, 181-190

Botzen, W. W. J., & Van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2012). How sensitive is Nordhaus to Weitzman? Climate policy in DICE with an alternative damage function. Economics Letters, 117(1), 372–374. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.05.032

Bruyn, S. De, Korteland, M., Markowska, A., Davidson, M., De Jong, F., Bles, M., & Sevenster, M. (2010). Shadow Prices Handbook: Valuation and weighting of emissions and environmental impacts (pp. 1–140).

ESPREME (2008): Estimation of willingness-to-pay to reduce risks of exposure to heavy metals and costbenefits analysis for reducing heavy metals occurrence in Europe. Final report. Contract No. 502527

Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., De Scryver, A., Sruijs, J. and Van Zelm, R. (2009): ReCiPe 2008, Report 1: Characterization., Ministry of VROM, The Hague, The Netherlands.

Huppes, G., van Oers, L., Pretato, U. & Pennington, D.W.(2012): Weighting environmental effects: Analytical survey with operational evaluation methods and a meta-method. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17, 876-891.

NIER (1998): Swedish environmental accounts for sulphur and nitrogen. Environmental accounts 1998:7, Stockholm.

Noring, M., Håkansson, C., Boalt, E. (2013) Costs and benefits from the management of the coastal environment. In preparation.

Tol, R. S. J. (2010). The Economic Impact of Climate Change. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 11, 13–37.
doi:10.1111/j.1468-2516.2010.00326.x


Full Text: PDF